Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PHN16-72

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive303% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PHN16-72  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL EQE_RTX
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '24 at 04:46
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-14500HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 54
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 209
64% 120 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 776
72% 599 Pts
64-Core 1,301
80% 1,301 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1731) 3.8GB
Driver: <> Ver. 32.0.101.5542
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
7.38% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 11.2
8% 12.2 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 14.4
Splatting 0.2
6% 8.13 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.38%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_3500_MTFDKBA512TGD-1BK15ABYY 512GB
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P8MA001 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1459 882 819 898 889 850 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
303% Outstanding
Read 3,860
Write 3,617
Mixed 2,353
SusWrite 966
602% 2,699 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 39.7
187% 80.2 MB/s
DQ Read 871
DQ Write 636
DQ Mixed 759
566% 755 MB/s
Poor: 303%
This bench: 303%
Great: 494%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4PB0-CWMOD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
74.4% Very good
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 26.1
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 16
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 29: 0P 4R 0G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
29% 21% 61 99 48 165 16" 1920 1200 CMN1616
Typical Predator PHN16-72 Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Acer Predator PHN16-72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback