Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT11-0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN 25L Desktop GT11-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87C3
Memory18.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220711
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateAug 27 '24 at 18:54
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$148
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 74.5
1-Core 136
2-Core 267
86% 159 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 890
84% 698 Pts
64-Core 1,236
76% 1,236 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$218
HP(103C 8789) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 560.70
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.2% Very good
Lighting 86.8
Reflection 85.1
Parallax 83.2
71% 85 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 77.4
Splatting 70.3
69% 87 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1006 512GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20120006
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,000
Write 1,072
Mixed 462
188% 845 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 63.7
208% 77.3 MB/s
DQ Read 926
DQ Write 716
DQ Mixed 812
610% 818 MB/s
Poor: 101% Great: 219%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
37GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 126 104 100 129 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 153
Write 150
Mixed 105
SusWrite 119
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
211% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
116GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 129 134 128 131 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 158
Write 162
Mixed 72
SusWrite 130
95% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD4AGUA80-32N2200 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.6% Very good
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 31.3
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 26
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 24.5" 1280 720 HPN3426 OMEN by HP 25
Typical OMEN 25L Desktop GT11-0xxx Builds (Compare 845 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

System: HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT11-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $308
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback