Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '24 at 03:44
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 83%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 68.8
1-Core 139
2-Core 185
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 873
78% 661 Pts
64-Core 1,166
72% 1,166 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$267
Asus(1043 8811) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 560.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
4.17% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 2.9
2% 3.07 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 23.4
Splatting 3.1
8% 9.8 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 4.17%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73
553GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 254 228 199 229 201 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 477
Write 335
Mixed 312
SusWrite 219
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 29.7
4K Mixed 15.9
51% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 882
DQ Write 434
DQ Mixed 719
518% 678 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 410%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$50
268GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 25 23 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Read 60.3
Write 19.6
Mixed 23.6
SusWrite 22.3
23% 31.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
80% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$50
128GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 25 22 20 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 55.7
Write 22
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 21.3
24% 32.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
50% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 96%
Hitachi HUH721212ALE601 12TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: LEGL0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 39 36 34 34 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 36
Write 40.5
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 34.4
26% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.3
71% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 139%
Seagate ST12000VN0008-2JH101 12TB
4TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 35 34 30 33 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 50.7
Write 34
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 31.6
26% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.3
162% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
62.7% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 23.7
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 27.2
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 4 60 36.1" 1280 720 TCL0000 65R635
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI Builds (Compare 6,805 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 183%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $1,039
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback