Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3504VA_K3504VAB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3504VA_K3504VAB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K3504VA
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231212
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 30 '24 at 05:04
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
13th Gen Intel Core i3-1315U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 54.9
1-Core 171
2-Core 301
91% 176 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 613
74% 567 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1793) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
9.89% Terrible
Lighting 11.2
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 13.7
9% 13.9 fps
MRender 15.1
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 11.7
11% 14.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.89%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA003 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 524 738 511 49 76 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 826
Write 1,002
Mixed 770
SusWrite 329
165% 732 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 91.5
4K Mixed 10.4
128% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 590
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 389
296% 409 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 107%
Great: 245%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 16GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62% Good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 24
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 9.8
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 2 60 15.5" 1920 1009 CMN15F5
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3504VA_K3504VAB Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3504VA_K3504VAB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback