Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3605ZF_K3605ZF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics8.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3605ZF_K3605ZF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K3605ZF
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230630
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 25 '23 at 22:18
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 73.3
1-Core 177
2-Core 336
103% 195 Pts
4-Core 602
8-Core 817
90% 709 Pts
64-Core 999
62% 999 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 92%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 18C3) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
8.6% Terrible
Lighting 8.1
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 9.6
7% 11.1 fps
MRender 17.1
Gravity 15.1
Splatting 14.1
12% 15.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.6%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,126
Write 1,387
Mixed 1,116
340% 1,543 MB/s
4K Read 65.1
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 86.5
306% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 453
DQ Write 538
DQ Mixed 154
211% 382 MB/s
Poor: 99% Great: 297%
USB DISK 30X 1GB
1GB free, PID 1d00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 9.9
Write 3.7
Mixed 3
6% 5.53 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 4%
SDHC Card 32GB
29GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 25.1
Write 10.2
Mixed 19.4
21% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2
126% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 31.7
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 39.5
SC Mixed 23.3
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 120 16" 1280 720 BOE0B2B
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3605ZF_K3605ZF Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3605ZF_K3605ZF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback