Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PH16-72

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive572% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemAcer Predator PH16-72  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL eTron_RTX
Memory20.6 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240122
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 02 '24 at 08:11
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Memory 79.7
1-Core 230
2-Core 444
129% 251 Pts
4-Core 856
8-Core 1,543
144% 1,199 Pts
64-Core 3,476
215% 3,476 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 120%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 172D) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
7% Terrible
Lighting 10.6
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 12.1
9% 12.9 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 13.5
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFS001TEJ9X125N 1TB
720GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51022A20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4263 4286 3618 1387 1388 1383 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
572% Outstanding
Read 5,074
Write 4,435
Mixed 2,862
SusWrite 2,721
844% 3,773 MB/s
4K Read 82.8
4K Write 306
4K Mixed 128
451% 172 MB/s
DQ Read 1,672
DQ Write 1,190
DQ Mixed 1,393
1,050% 1,418 MB/s
Poor: 295%
This bench: 572%
Great: 581%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78AGBSA095N Apacer D22.3528WM.001 32GB
5600, 5600 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
150% Outstanding
MC Read 63.9
MC Write 56
MC Mixed 56.5
168% 58.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 45.3
SC Mixed 26.1
86% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 150%
This bench: 150%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 59 38 240 16" 1707 996 CMN162F
Typical Predator PH16-72 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Acer Predator PH16-72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback