Today's hottest deals

One-netbook ONEXPLAYER X1 A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 137%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 141%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics187% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive428% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemOne-netbook ONEXPLAYER X1 A  (all builds)
MotherboardONE-NETBOOK ONEXPLAYER X1 A
Memory42 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 2560 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '24 at 09:15
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 56.1
1-Core 127
2-Core 249
76% 144 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 807
78% 640 Pts
64-Core 1,195
74% 1,195 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$709
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
187% Outstanding
Lighting 275
Reflection 251
Parallax 294
224% 273 fps
MRender 309
Gravity 207
Splatting 169
180% 228 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 187%
Great: 202%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Acer N7000 4TB
2.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN15536
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3404 3485 3460 3690 424 133 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
428% Outstanding
Read 3,681
Write 3,417
Mixed 3,252
SusWrite 2,432
718% 3,196 MB/s
4K Read 65
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 84.3
275% 92.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,211
DQ Write 870
DQ Mixed 895
708% 992 MB/s
Poor: 428%
This bench: 428%
Great: 519%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F4G32D8DV-026 WT 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB 23h clocked @ 7500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
150% Outstanding
MC Read 52.7
MC Write 67.9
MC Mixed 48.6
161% 56.4 GB/s
SC Read 39.4
SC Write 46.2
SC Mixed 48
127% 44.5 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 150%
Great: 150%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 36 4 60 34.1" 2560 1009 GSM76F9 LG ULTRAWIDE
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback