Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B650M-E WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics46% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650M-E WIFI  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240905
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 24 '24 at 00:29
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G-$279
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Memory 71.7
1-Core 182
2-Core 360
106% 205 Pts
4-Core 643
8-Core 1,103
106% 873 Pts
64-Core 1,439
89% 1,439 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 96%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Asus(1043 8877) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.40.02
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46% Average
Lighting 52.3
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 87.7
43% 52.8 fps
MRender 18.7
Gravity 68.4
Splatting 91.4
53% 59.5 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 46%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC3000S1024G 1TB
858GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK51.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,425
Write 3,462
Mixed 2,566
634% 2,818 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 67.9
207% 72.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,610
DQ Write 1,147
DQ Mixed 1379
1,030% 1,379 MB/s
Poor: 237% Great: 518%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
JUHOR JHE6000U4616JG 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
122% Outstanding
MC Read 49.8
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 48.5
122% 42.9 GB/s
SC Read 43.7
SC Write 50.5
SC Mixed 46.4
134% 46.9 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 122%
This bench: 122%
Great: 179%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 34.1" 1280 720 GSM7714 LG HDR WFHD
Typical TUF GAMING B650M-E WIFI Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 210%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650M-E WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $476
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback