Today's hottest deals

Medion Crawler E30

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMedion Crawler E30  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION NPx0PNJ
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230306
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 06 '24 at 16:14
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
61.5% Good
Memory 68.2
1-Core 128
2-Core 209
75% 135 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 390
44% 347 Pts
64-Core 441
27% 441 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 866D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 32.0.15.6590
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.5% Good
Lighting 79.9
Reflection 75.2
Parallax 67.9
65% 74.3 fps
MRender 72.1
Gravity 58.8
Splatting 60
52% 63.6 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E19-512G-PHISON-SSD-V7 512GB
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFMC0.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,382
Write 1,938
Mixed 875
313% 1,398 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 40.5
163% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 505
DQ Write 373
DQ Mixed 339
280% 406 MB/s
Poor: 171% Great: 250%
SDXC 512GB
48GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 89
Write 81.1
Mixed 69.3
60% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 5.3
1,026% 5.97 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer D22.27569S.001 Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.7% Very good
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 17.4
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 20.4
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 56 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE090F
Typical Crawler E30 Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Medion Crawler E30

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $220Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback