Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82WM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics7.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive357% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82WM  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory16.5 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240422
Uptime6.7 Days
Run DateOct 07 '24 at 14:35
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
FL1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 73.8
1-Core 190
2-Core 383
111% 216 Pts
4-Core 750
8-Core 1,379
128% 1,065 Pts
64-Core 3,120
193% 3,120 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 107%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 610M
Legend(17AA 3C55) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.10.16
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
7.06% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 12.2
5% 10.6 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 22
11% 12.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.06%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00BL2 1TB
548GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EL1QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2902 2860 2447 1450 1552 1545 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
357% Outstanding
Read 2,050
Write 2,719
Mixed 2,394
SusWrite 2,126
526% 2,322 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 90.3
265% 96.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,426
DQ Write 1,314
DQ Mixed 1,382
1,034% 1,374 MB/s
Poor: 201%
This bench: 357%
Great: 458%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSB3410HA88IBF-5600 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
127% Outstanding
MC Read 49
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 46.2
132% 46.2 GB/s
SC Read 37.4
SC Write 48.5
SC Mixed 40.7
121% 42.2 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 127%
This bench: 127%
Great: 174%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 164 1 240 16" 1280 720 BOE0C8C
Typical 82WM Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

System: Lenovo 82WM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback