Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0510

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 260%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 312%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics223% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive464% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemRazer Blade 16 - RZ09-0510  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer SO6100
Memory54.6 GB free of 64 GB
Display5120 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '24 at 19:58
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Memory 86.7
1-Core 222
2-Core 424
127% 244 Pts
4-Core 821
8-Core 1,457
137% 1,139 Pts
64-Core 3,196
198% 3,196 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 120%
Great: 122%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090 (Laptop)
Device(1A58 300A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 561.09
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
223% Outstanding
Lighting 313
Reflection 353
Parallax 356
255% 340 fps
MRender 455
Gravity 288
Splatting 218
250% 320 fps
Poor: 144%
This bench: 223%
Great: 243%
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1A58 300D) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5081
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
8.2% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 11.3
9% 12.8 fps
MRender 14.8
Gravity 15.2
Splatting 0.1
7% 10 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.2%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CA6-8D2048 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: ERB0906 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3516 3391 3439 1936 1479 1557 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
464% Outstanding
Read 2,858
Write 2,807
Mixed 2,805
SusWrite 2,553
622% 2,756 MB/s
4K Read 60.3
4K Write 256
4K Mixed 106
362% 141 MB/s
DQ Read 2,130
DQ Write 1,536
DQ Mixed 1,785
1,347% 1,817 MB/s
Poor: 338%
This bench: 464%
Great: 464%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF556S40-32 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
186% Outstanding
MC Read 76.3
MC Write 73
MC Mixed 71.2
210% 73.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 50.8
SC Mixed 34.1
102% 35.7 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 112%
This bench: 186%
Great: 185%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 1 72 39.7" 1280 720 GSM9E82 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical Blade 16 - RZ09-0510 Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 237%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 292%
UFO

System: Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0510

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback