Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FA506IV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive97.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FA506IV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506IV
Memory0.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220426
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 16 '24 at 21:42
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
38.5% Below average
Memory 41.4
1-Core 50.3
2-Core 99.5
36% 63.7 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 346
32% 269 Pts
64-Core 515
32% 515 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 1E21) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.14
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Lighting 15.1
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 22.8
12% 16.1 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 17.8
Splatting 16.4
12% 14.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
221GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 705 88 104 58 180 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 1,088
Write 851
Mixed 764
SusWrite 200
162% 726 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 31.7
99% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 245
182% 243 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 247%
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1114 512GB
232GB free
Firmware: 21113000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 812 390 396 369 363 400 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 1,266
Write 1,291
Mixed 1,042
SusWrite 455
227% 1,013 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 39.2
4K Mixed 28.2
94% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 241
180% 242 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 118%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 16GB
2400, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
45.5% Average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 16.5
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 10.4
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 10: 0P 1R 0G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 17% 35 167 48 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FA506IV Builds (Compare 637 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FA506IV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback