Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive59.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '18 at 12:00
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 98
2-Core 176
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 459
49% 388 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 145
Parallax 140
117% 143 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 140
Splatting 108
97% 120 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S480G 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JA0OA7G0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.5% Very poor
Read 101
Write 97.5
Mixed 61.1
19% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.18
2% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 20%
Toshiba HG6 256GB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JURA0101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 353
Write 337
Mixed 323
75% 338 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 16.3
77% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 15.2
DQ Write 51.6
DQ Mixed 15.6
17% 27.5 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 109%
SanDisk SSD Plus 480GB-$39
77GB free
Firmware: Z32070RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 358
Write 288
Mixed 213
63% 286 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 54.6
4K Mixed 3.14
54% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 20.8
DQ Write 91.6
DQ Mixed 1.56
17% 38 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 76%
Hitachi HDT721075SLA380 750GB
450GB free
Firmware: ST4OA31B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 85.4
Write 76.8
Mixed 26.7
46% 62.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.29
78% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.4% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 990 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $173
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback