Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160119
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 27 '18 at 20:40
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 880K-$105
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
47.1% Average
Memory 70.4
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 71.5
47% 70.6 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 188
20% 160 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
Sapphire(174B E221) 2GB
CLim: 920 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.1.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Lighting 27.4
Reflection 29.1
Parallax 32.6
22% 29.7 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 34.6
23% 27.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 479
Write 316
Mixed 313
82% 369 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 12.3
75% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 27.4
DQ Write 77.6
DQ Mixed 9.99
20% 38.3 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
123GB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 127
Write 129
Mixed 99.1
88% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.18
72% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST3160212AS 160GB
1GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 33.8
Write 33.1
Mixed 33.2
25% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.4
93% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BD160B SLA302G08-GGN 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.2% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 13.9
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 8.8
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A78M-HD2 Builds (Compare 249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $86
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback