Today's hottest deals

Asus GL552JX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus GL552JX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL552JX
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151222
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 31 '18 at 16:34
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4750HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 181
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 416
46% 361 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
Asus(1043 1A8D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8871
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 19
21% 21.1 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 25.1
Splatting 18.5
15% 18.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8280S3128GH2 128GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03020064 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 393
Write 377
Mixed 326
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 11.2
68% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 20.2
DQ Write 33
DQ Mixed 10.9
13% 21.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 67%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
568GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 101
Write 89.3
Mixed 83.1
68% 91 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.17
70% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SRT8G86S1-P9H 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 8.6
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 10.4
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL552JX Builds (Compare 649 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL552JX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback