| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-DGS R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20131001 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 01 '16 at 15:34 |
| Run Duration | 94 Seconds |
| Run User | PRT-User |
| Background CPU | 56% |
PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
|
70.1%
Very good
|
72% 124 Pts
|
46% 365 Pts
|
29% 466 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Asus(1043 844E) 3GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6143
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.7%
Very poor
|
16% 20.6 fps
|
20% 24.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
35.3%
Below average
|
34% 153 MB/s
|
66% 22.9 MB/s
|
12% 24.4 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5403-430.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
24.6%
Poor
|
21% 7.4 GB/s
|
23% 8 GB/s
|
54% 73.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-DGS R2.0 Builds (Compare 300 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-DGS R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 48x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 41x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 26x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 29x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 21x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 16x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $325 |