Asus M2N-VM HDMI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M2N-VM HDMI  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20071031
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '18 at 10:01
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5600+
AM2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
37.9% Below average
Memory 63
1-Core 40.3
2-Core 76
39% 59.8 Pts
4-Core 77.3
8-Core 75
10% 76.2 Pts
64-Core 81.7
5% 81.7 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT
MSI(1462 1270) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.22% Terrible
Lighting 6.17
Reflection 9.23
Parallax 2.06
5% 5.82 fps
MRender 9.86
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 6.65
6% 6.94 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.22%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD320LD 320GB
77GB free
Firmware: BQ100-14 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 60.9
Write 54.7
Mixed 39.2
38% 51.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.29
4K Mixed 0.33
78% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 33%
Seagate ST3320613AS 320GB-$30
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SD11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 97.2
Write 109
Mixed 28.2
57% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.36
96% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 5.8
17% 5.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 5
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2N-VM HDMI Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Asus M2N-VM HDMI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback