Asus GL502VS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAsus GL502VS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL502VS
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160624
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '18 at 07:39
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 72.9
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 175
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 504
52% 418 Pts
64-Core 488
30% 488 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung NVMe MZVPV256HDGL-00000 256GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1,785
Write 902
Mixed 1,150
282% 1,279 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 41.7
166% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 129
137% 228 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 189%
Great: 247%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
530GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 111
Write 112
Mixed 116
86% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.21
75% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 75%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 128GB
119GB free, PID 0747
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 87.2
Write 81.5
Mixed 78
105% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 9.61
4K Write 3.96
4K Mixed 2.41
252% 5.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.8% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 10.7
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 12
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL502VS Builds (Compare 429 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

System: Asus GL502VS - $1,607

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Total price: $1,607
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback