Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP xw8600 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP xw8600 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0A98h
Memory	2.6 GB free of 4.00098 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080505
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 09 '18 at 19:49
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5450 826 User benchmarks, average bench 47% XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	42.6% Average	Memory 56.3 1-Core 39.7 2-Core 76.4 36% 57.5 Pts	4-Core 157 8-Core 261 26% 209 Pts	64-Core 308 19% 308 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5850 15,020 User benchmarks, average bench 15% MSI(1462 2091) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	16% Very poor	Lighting 22 Reflection 12.8 Parallax 20 18% 18.3 fps	MRender 11.4 Gravity 16.3 Splatting 16.3 12% 14.7 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$57 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 227GB free (System drive) Firmware: 12.01B02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 157 155 5150 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8121 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 64 64 26596 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 776 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 151 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 8122 (C2) HDA temperature 124 89 23 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	39.3% Below average	Read 67.8 Write 68.9 Mixed 28.7 40% 55.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.3 87% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 60%
Seagate ST3200826AS 200GB 2,004 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 163GB free Firmware: 3.03 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 67 53 226841151 (03) Spinup time 98 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1958 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 228827397 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 5396 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1845 (C2) HDA temperature 25 49 60129542169 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 67 52 226841151 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	31.7% Below average	Read 55.6 Write 54.7 Mixed 26 34% 45.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 0.93 4K Mixed 0.35 78% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 37%
Hitachi HTS543225L9A300 250GB-$30 4,341 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 106GB free Firmware: FBEOC40F Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 99 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 253 100 12884901888 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1188 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 65541 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 4030 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 879 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 459562745857 (BC) Unknown 100 98 56 (BE) vendor-specific 79 30 996786110485 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 99 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 4980812 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 84 84 169234 (C2) HDA temperature 253 78 300648497173 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 99 0	26.8% Poor	Read 48.7 Write 44.7 Mixed 13.1 26% 35.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.01 4K Mixed 0.28 68% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 37GB 3,950 User benchmarks, average bench 15% null MHz 2048, 2048, 33792 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 6 14% 4.77 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 4.3 10% 3.57 GB/s	Latency 139 29% 139 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 22%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical xw8600 Workstation Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

System: HP xw8600 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X54501stBench 47%, 826 samples	21x
CPU: Intel Xeon X54501stBench 47%, 324 samples	17x
Xeon X5450Intel $299Bench 50%, 5,870 samples	12x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	11x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	9x
Quadro FX 5600NvidiaBench 6%, 254 samples	9x

SSD
870 QVO 2TBSamsung $165Bench 102%, 41,734 samples	9x
870 EVO 250G 250GBSamsungBench 92%, 167 samples	4x
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

RAM
49GBUnknownBench 18%, 1,461 samples	47x
65GBUnknownBench 19%, 1,017 samples	37x
41GBUnknownBench 17%, 2,583 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $224

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350