Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-DS2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A55M-DS2  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131126
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '18 at 08:25
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 82
1-Core 74.5
2-Core 137
60% 97.9 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 229
31% 230 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.7% Average
Lighting 61
Reflection 65
Parallax 58.3
50% 61.4 fps
MRender 71.8
Gravity 58.9
Splatting 54.9
50% 61.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV300S37A120G 120GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.K Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.7% Average
Read 176
Write 197
Mixed 155
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 9.94
79% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 26.3
DQ Write 70.8
DQ Mixed 9.91
19% 35.7 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
117GB free
Firmware: KC48 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 68.1
Write 68.1
Mixed 70.7
52% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.84
4K Mixed 0.38
74% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1600KLH-8G TS1GLK64V6H 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.8% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 11.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 9.4
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A55M-DS2 Builds (Compare 238 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-DS2 - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $353
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback