Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '14 at 14:59
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$153
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 78.5
2-Core 149
52% 114 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 537
51% 424 Pts
64-Core 535
33% 535 Pts
Poor: 47% Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
XFX(1682 3001) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.100.0.0
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.4% Below average
Lighting 38.8
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 50
32% 38.7 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 41.9
Splatting 33.8
28% 33.9 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
48GB free
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 491
Write 134
Mixed 199
60% 275 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 13.5
69% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 23.6
DQ Write 46
DQ Mixed 9.85
15% 26.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
2TB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 178
Mixed 168
134% 178 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.33
94% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 105%
Great: 113%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 161GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 157
Mixed 157
124% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.3
93% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 97%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
29GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 50.6
Write 18
Mixed 12.7
28% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.71
4K Write 0.77
4K Mixed 0.03
37% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 28%
Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,066 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback