User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardSupermicro X8DAH
Memory40.9 GB free of 48.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110827
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '18 at 15:00
Run Duration94 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 66.1
1-Core 86.8
2-Core 162
60% 105 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 569
55% 455 Pts
64-Core 1,378
85% 1,378 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 6000
Nvidia(10DE 076F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 5.2GB, Driver: 341.96
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Lighting 17.7
Reflection 25.7
Parallax 19.7
14% 21 fps
MRender 25.9
Gravity 14.5
Splatting 23.8
18% 21.4 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M5S 256GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.3% Below average
Read 188
Write 176
Mixed 159
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 9.15
36% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 18.3
DQ Write 32.5
DQ Mixed 10.7
12% 20.5 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965426-059.A00LF 9965426-059.A00LF 9965426-059.A00LF 9965426-059.A00LF 9965426-059.A00LF 9965426-059.A00LF 9965426-059.A00LF 9965426-059.A00LF 9965426-059.A0... 84GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.2% Above average
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 20
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9.7
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback