Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus Z10PE-D16 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PE-D16 WS
Memory44.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '18 at 14:02
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 57.4
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 197
63% 117 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 683
62% 521 Pts
64-Core 1,803
112% 1,803 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
PNY(196E 119E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 141
Parallax 121
105% 130 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 130
Splatting 109
96% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 1TB-$65
823GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 468
Write 306
Mixed 336
82% 370 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 24.1
4K Mixed 9.77
49% 16.6 MB/s
DQ Read 14.7
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 7.68
28% 57.3 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 104%
Samsung 850 Pro 2TB-$320
587GB free
Firmware: EXM03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 514
Write 491
Mixed 512
113% 506 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 26.1
87% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 122
132% 219 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF2G72PDZ-2G3B1 3x16GB
3 of 16 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56% Above average
MC Read 39
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 12.5
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 12.8
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z10PE-D16 WS Builds (Compare 290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

System: Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $306
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback