HP Pro 3400 Series MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Pro 3400 Series MT  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ABF
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '18 at 15:32
Run Duration281 Seconds
Run User MUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2405S
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 76.3
2-Core 142
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 263
35% 262 Pts
64-Core 259
16% 259 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 550 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.46% Terrible
Lighting 1.77
Reflection 2.04
Parallax 0.75
1% 1.52 fps
MRender 2.19
Gravity 1.63
Splatting 1.7
2% 1.84 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.46%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA41A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 91.4
Write 86.9
Mixed 74.8
63% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.26
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.33
71% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9DNSBNZE-TATP ST51264BA1339.16FM 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 14
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro 3400 Series MT Builds (Compare 535 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3400 Series MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback