HP Compaq 8510w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8510w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 30C5
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080205
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '18 at 12:21
Run Duration335 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T9300-$70
U10, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
41% Average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 35.3
2-Core 69.5
40% 58.5 Pts
4-Core 68.2
8-Core 70.8
9% 69.5 Pts
64-Core 71.5
4% 71.5 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 570M
HP(103C 30C5) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
1.6% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 0.62
2% 1.98 fps
MRender 2.38
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 2.96
2% 2.19 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.6%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Portable SSD T1 250GB
109GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
8.39% Terrible
Read 34.6
Write 21.8
Mixed 23
6% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 7.09
4K Write 6.57
4K Mixed 3.82
19% 5.83 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 8.39%
Great: 71%
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.1% Below average
Read 173
Write 181
Mixed 177
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 30.4
4K Mixed 10.6
54% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 14.9
DQ Write 39.7
DQ Mixed 10.7
13% 21.8 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 97%
Ricoh SD Disk Device 31GB
2GB free
Firmware: 01
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
3.21% Terrible
Read 2
Write 8.04
Mixed 3.3
3% 4.45 MB/s
4K Read 3.39
4K Write 0.17
4K Mixed 0.17
163% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.21%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 4.1
13% 4.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8510w Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8510w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback