Asus P5N-D

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	7.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	9.62% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P5N-D (all builds)
Memory	2.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100621
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 02 '18 at 21:28
Run Duration	325 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	47%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E4600 6,872 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	35.8% Below average	Memory 65.2 1-Core 16.5 2-Core 47.3 31% 43 Pts	4-Core 41.8 8-Core 34.2 5% 38 Pts	64-Core 50.6 3% 50.6 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640 34,519 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	7.11% Terrible	Lighting 8.27 Reflection 7.5 Parallax 8.94 7% 8.23 fps	MRender 8.14 Gravity 9.83 Splatting 10.3 8% 9.44 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.11% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Seri 250GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT0 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	9.62% Terrible	Read 56.9 Write 32.5 Mixed 38 9% 42.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.17 4K Write 14.1 4K Mixed 2.05 16% 6.78 MB/s	DQ Read 14.3 DQ Write 15.6 DQ Mixed 4.47 6% 11.5 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 9.62% Great: 57%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2TB free Firmware: 80.0 Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	57.5% Above average	Read 107 Write 92.6 Mixed 95 74% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.92 4K Write 2.76 4K Mixed 0.3 122% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 96%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 929GB free Firmware: 80.0 Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	57.3% Above average	Read 105 Write 93.8 Mixed 98.4 75% 99.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.92 4K Write 2.44 4K Mixed 0.27 113% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 96%
asmedia ASMT1153e 3TB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 346GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Read 30.1 Write 30.1 Mixed 28.8 38% 29.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.24 63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 60%
NORELSYS 106X 3TB 138 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 73GB free, PID 1066 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Read 29.8 Write 30.2 Mixed 24.6 36% 28.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.25 69% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 73%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00WN9B0 3TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 26GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.5% Very poor	Read 30.1 Write 30.3 Mixed 27.3 38% 29.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.22 70% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 2.9 9% 3.17 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 1.9 7% 2.43 GB/s	Latency 113 35% 113 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5N-D Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5N-D

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	20x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	18x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 660-TiNvidia $362Bench 26%, 42,960 samples	7x
GeForce 9800 GTXNvidiaBench 8%, 3,983 samples	7x
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples	5x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
SSD 128GBBench 64%, 3,975 samples	2x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	2x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	55x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	14x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 24% - Poor

Total price: $490

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16