Asus G551JW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus G551JW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G551JW
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150803
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateMar 19 '18 at 13:42
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4750HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 88.5
2-Core 177
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 469
47% 381 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 5200 (V2 Mobile 1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 185D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
5.22% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 8.28
5% 10.4 fps
MRender 8.57
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 10.4
6% 7.42 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.22%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SMSM151S324GD 24GB
18GB free
Firmware: S9FM01B9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
42% Average
Read 298
Write 58.9
Mixed 121
34% 159 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 3.95
76% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 90.5
DQ Mixed 3.57
35% 85.2 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42%
Great: 54%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
242GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JB0OA3J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 123
Write 126
Mixed 123
93% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.19
63% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9S3L/8G Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.3% Good
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 20.1
72% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 17.7
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G551JW Builds (Compare 655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G551JW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback