Ztsystem CYPRESS11

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Ztsystem CYPRESS11 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel S2600CP
Memory	238.3 GB free of 256 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170324
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Mar 21 '18 at 10:51
Run Duration	228 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 4,306 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Memory 56.3 1-Core 72.4 2-Core 138 51% 89 Pts	4-Core 296 8-Core 492 48% 394 Pts	64-Core 1,552 96% 1,552 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000 8,041 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Nvidia(10DE 11BC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.3 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	26.4% Poor	Lighting 33.3 Reflection 22.7 Parallax 27.6 27% 27.8 fps	MRender 27 Gravity 30 Splatting 33.4 25% 30.1 fps
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$255 44,466 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 2TB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 347 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 70 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 72 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 34 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2693000393	87.3% Excellent	Read 509 Write 400 Mixed 424 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 33.1 4K Write 53 4K Mixed 32.1 119% 39.4 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 63.4 66% 109 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 347 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 72 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 65 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 34 (F1) Unknown 99 99 691018288	88.2% Excellent	Read 494 Write 405 Mixed 415 98% 438 MB/s	4K Read 34.8 4K Write 54 4K Mixed 31.7 122% 40.2 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 117 DQ Mixed 66.7 71% 119 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 4.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 151 150 9433 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2367 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 57 57 31401 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 125 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 110 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 135 135 195396 (C2) HDA temperature 120 105 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	47.7% Average	Read 81.4 Write 84.5 Mixed 80.8 62% 82.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.23 81% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113 12,948 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 4.5TB free Firmware: 04.05G04 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 174 174 4316314 (03) Spinup time 185 146 7716 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 276 (05) Reallocated sector count 41 41 1265 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 20827 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 135 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 127 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 192 192 24198 (C2) HDA temperature 120 103 32 (C4) Reallocation count 1 1 1265 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 196 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 196 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 1 1 1139929	42.2% Average	Read 66.8 Write 80.1 Mixed 86.2 59% 77.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 0.2 79% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 60%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 4.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 144 139 9775 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1492 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 1 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 51 51 35883 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 145 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 129 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 169 169 95067 (C2) HDA temperature 122 111 30 (C4) Reallocation count 199 199 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	55.1% Above average	Read 104 Write 87.8 Mixed 79.8 68% 90.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.98 4K Mixed 0.25 92% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 4.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 147 146 9650 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 231 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 14074 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 90 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 81 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 185 185 47683 (C2) HDA temperature 122 114 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	52.6% Above average	Read 104 Write 79.1 Mixed 80.3 66% 87.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.97 4K Mixed 0.22 90% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0-YH9 16x16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 16 of 16 slots used 256GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	58.3% Above average	MC Read 26 MC Write 23.1 MC Mixed 22.2 68% 23.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 5.8 16% 5.57 GB/s	Latency 139 29% 139 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CYPRESS11 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 92%

Nuclear submarine

System: Ztsystem CYPRESS11

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	10x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples	1x
Xeon E5-2665 0IntelBench 67%, 1,061 samples	1x

GPU
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	3x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	1x
GeForce GT 740NvidiaBench 7%, 30,433 samples	1x

SSD
MZ7LM480HCHP-000G3 480GBSamsungBench 95%, 6 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
850 Pro 1TBSamsung $210Bench 105%, 25,365 samples	1x

RAM
M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YH9 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YH9 64GBSamsungBench 56%, 3 samples	3x
AM472D3LD4P13C9EC 14x8GBKingstonBench 78%, 3 samples	2x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $340

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16