Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory7 GB free of 10 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1536 x 864 - 32 Bit colors, , , ,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '18 at 14:27
Run Duration84 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
CPU socket #0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 112
2-Core 218
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 416
57% 423 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID M60-2Q
Nvidia(10DE 114E) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 369.95
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Lighting 65
Reflection 65.6
Parallax 58.8
53% 63.1 fps
MRender 56.3
Gravity 61.6
Splatting 59.2
48% 59 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 51%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 215GB
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
null MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 39.3
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 47.1
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 18.2
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 103%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,010 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback