Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire Z3-451

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire Z3-451  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire Z3-451
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161026
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 26 '18 at 14:13
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5757M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Memory 46.2
1-Core 15.2
2-Core 26.6
22% 29.3 Pts
4-Core 44.2
8-Core 45.6
6% 44.9 Pts
64-Core 43.7
3% 43.7 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8650G
Device(1297 2064) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1006
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
1.69% Terrible
Lighting 0.47
Reflection 0.81
Parallax 0.38
0% 0.55 fps
MRender 4.14
Gravity 4
Splatting 6.65
4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.69%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 113
Write 110
Mixed 104
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 0.99
4K Mixed 0.13
53% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown A1_ A1_ 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.13 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 3.1
8% 2.87 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire Z3-451 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire Z3-451

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback