Asus H110M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H110M-K  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171212
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 27 '18 at 12:56
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$40
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 207
82% 141 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 343
41% 315 Pts
64-Core 325
20% 325 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.24
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Lighting 34.5
Reflection 32
Parallax 45.6
28% 37.4 fps
MRender 42.8
Gravity 40.8
Splatting 35.7
32% 39.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sony Hard Drive 1TB
483GB free
Firmware: 5438 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 45.7
Write 46.2
Mixed 45.8
35% 45.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 2.22
4K Mixed 0.4
108% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 54%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28
614GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 159
Write 152
Mixed 144
114% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.98
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.31
105% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
41.1% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 10.7
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 12.8
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 6,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback