Asrock B75 Pro3-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsrock B75 Pro3-M  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280x1024x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20131224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '18 at 16:10
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3240
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 94
2-Core 103
61% 93.9 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 218
31% 227 Pts
64-Core 235
15% 235 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 305
Write 105
Mixed 134
40% 182 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 10.1
56% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 73.5
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 23.3
37% 69.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 73%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
13GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
50% Average
Read 92
Write 81.8
Mixed 78.7
63% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 2.49
4K Mixed 0.35
104% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50%
Great: 77%
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$47
17GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 60
Write 59.7
Mixed 56.4
44% 58.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.29
72% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 40%
Maxell HDD 2TB
2TB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 29.4
Write 36.8
Mixed 12.3
33% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 6.01
4K Mixed 0.38
221% 2.42 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31%
Great: 31%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
3GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 57.4
Write 71.1
Mixed 74.2
91% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.31
66% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 9905402-570.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.5% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 8.1
24% 8.57 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 8.9
24% 8.57 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75 Pro3-M Builds (Compare 564 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B75 Pro3-M - $85

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback