ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 4269AL1

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Lenovo 4269AL1 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO Lenovo
Memory	6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110519
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 01 '18 at 07:20
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon L5630 219 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1366-pin LGA, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	47.1% Average	Memory 55.5 1-Core 52.7 2-Core 107 43% 71.7 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 381 35% 295 Pts	64-Core 535 33% 535 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% EVGA(3842 1962) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	34.7% Below average	Lighting 44.9 Reflection 43 Parallax 38.7 37% 42.2 fps	MRender 39.3 Gravity 40 Splatting 35.5 31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Asus RAIDR Express PCIe 1,224 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 180GB free (System drive) Firmware: MV.R00-0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value	47.1% Average	Read 371 Write 297 Mixed 302 72% 323 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 35.2 4K Mixed 6.58 46% 18 MB/s	DQ Read 14.4 DQ Write 27.1 DQ Mixed 6.73 9% 16.1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 101%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 16GB 879 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1GB free, PID cb10 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	4.39% Terrible	Read 16.8 Write 5.99 Mixed 9.27 12% 10.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.67 4K Write 0.007 4K Mixed 0.009 10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.39% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M393B1G70BH0-YK0 1x8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1 of 12 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	18% Very poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 5.6 17% 6 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4.6 14% 5.03 GB/s	Latency 142 28% 142 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 25%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback