Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics36.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160113
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateApr 02 '18 at 02:47
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4300-$73
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 40.4
1-Core 31.6
2-Core 69.3
28% 47.1 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 190
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.1% Below average
Lighting 42.1
Reflection 56.2
Parallax 57
34% 51.8 fps
MRender 56.9
Gravity 41.3
Splatting 47.2
39% 48.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 494
Write 380
Mixed 411
95% 428 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 30.1
4K Mixed 21.3
78% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 73.6
DQ Write 50.7
DQ Mixed 28.1
30% 50.8 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 124%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$60
188GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 106
Write 102
Mixed 95
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 2.19
4K Mixed 0.25
86% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 12GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
30.6% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 11.9
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.9
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 200
20% 200 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 906 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback