Asus N53SM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAsus N53SM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N53SM
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120810
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateApr 02 '18 at 08:18
Run Duration99 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 74.7
2-Core 144
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 335
36% 289 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 2114) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.88% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 1.41
2% 2.66 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.83
2% 2.62 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.88%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ESA3SMD2HSLB120GB 120GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1126F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 358
Write 251
Mixed 298
67% 302 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 53.2
4K Mixed 12.1
68% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 18.2
DQ Write 54.4
DQ Mixed 11.1
16% 27.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BF160BJ.M8F 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
27.3% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 8
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N53SM Builds (Compare 118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N53SM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback