ADD TO PC
BUILD

LG 15N530-UT50K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Graphics	4.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	LG 15N530-UT50K (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bitì,
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140313
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 07 '14 at 08:43
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39 33,019 User benchmarks, average bench 50% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 84.8 2-Core 153 55% 119 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 198 26% 197 Pts	64-Core 245 15% 245 Pts
Poor: 25% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1854 1050) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3383 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	4.12% Terrible	Lighting 4.97 Reflection 6.62 Parallax 6.38 4% 5.99 fps	MRender 4.86 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 7.52 4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.12% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
RevuAhn_M850X1M256GB 256GB 201GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0815B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 26 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 29 (A3) Unknown 100 100 17 (A4) Unknown 100 100 449 (A5) Unknown 100 100 4 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 47 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 58 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2486 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1358 (F5) Unknown 100 100 3592	83.3% Excellent	Read 495 Write 294 Mixed 376 86% 388 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 77.8 4K Mixed 31.8 107% 42.1 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 276 DQ Mixed 70.1 108% 204 MB/s

Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40 42,694 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 698GB free Firmware: AX005L Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1641 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 217 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 327 (0A) Spinup retry count 104 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 206 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 4 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 19 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 7822 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 201864642586 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 280 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 270 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	63.3% Good	Read 108 Write 113 Mixed 102 81% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.23 67% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 57%
SAMSUNG HM321HI 320GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 203GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Read 39.7 Write 40.3 Mixed 39.9 52% 39.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.37 65% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 19%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback