Today's hottest deals

HP Z200 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z200 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B40h
Memory3.5 GB free of 6.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20101118
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 28 '17 at 00:54
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
44.8% Average
Memory 65.7
1-Core 76.2
2-Core 139
55% 93.7 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 149
19% 144 Pts
64-Core 155
10% 155 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
MSI(1462 809F) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.53
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.63% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 2.23
Parallax 1.75
2% 2.02 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 2.17
Splatting 1.57
2% 1.91 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.63%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$55
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.03E02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 81.6
Write 80.1
Mixed 78
60% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.16
4K Mixed 0.41
93% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 55%
SAMSUNG HM321HI 320GB
169GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 28.6
Write 22.7
Mixed 23.8
31% 25 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 0.78
4K Mixed 0.24
36% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT112U6BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT112U6BFR8C-H9 ID:80 CE M391B5673EH1-CH9 ID:80 AD HMT325U7BFR8C-H9 42GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
1024, 1024, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.3% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 10.7
27% 9.43 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 7.4
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z200 Workstation Builds (Compare 245 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z200 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback