Lenovo 5016R14

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemLenovo 5016R14  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 5016R14
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110613
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 13 '18 at 21:04
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron B810
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Memory 40
1-Core 37.9
2-Core 78.8
31% 52.2 Pts
4-Core 61.2
8-Core 72.2
9% 66.7 Pts
64-Core 54.6
3% 54.6 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21DD) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.9% Terrible
Lighting 0.97
Reflection 1.27
Parallax 0.84
1% 1.03 fps
MRender 1.57
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.74
1% 1.34 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.9%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 336
Write 214
Mixed 174
53% 241 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 1.96
31% 10.3 MB/s
DQ Read 15.7
DQ Write 48.8
DQ Mixed 1.96
10% 22.1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30
204GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 56.1
Write 56.8
Mixed 51.4
41% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.29
76% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 014F JM1333KSN-2G 4GB
1334, 1334 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.3% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 13.3
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 202
20% 202 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback