Lenovo 2429W8V

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Lenovo 2429W8V (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 2429W8V
Memory	7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180308
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 20 '18 at 15:17
Run Duration	970 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199 30,496 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	55% Above average	Memory 78.8 1-Core 71 2-Core 121 56% 90.3 Pts	4-Core 183 8-Core 187 25% 185 Pts	64-Core 189 12% 189 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 21F6) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	5.43% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 4.54 Parallax 4.34 4% 4.39 fps	MRender 9.86 Gravity 4.9 Splatting 16.6 9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.43% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 458 Write 191 Mixed 182 60% 277 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 24.5 4K Mixed 9.2 56% 18 MB/s	DQ Read 208 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 17.8 50% 111 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 82%
ADATA CH11 1.5TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 229GB free, PID a11a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	30.2% Below average	Read 71 Write 70.1 Mixed 19.1 63% 53.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 0.19 58% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 41%
KINGSTON SHFS37A120G 120GB 71GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	60.1% Good	Read 39.3 Write 38.6 Mixed 37.9 50% 38.6 MB/s	4K Read 9.95 4K Write 14.2 4K Mixed 7.29 768% 10.5 MB/s	DQ Read 12.3 DQ Write 15.9 DQ Mixed 7.53 844% 11.9 MB/s

SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23 12,481 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 34GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 35.2 Write 10 Mixed 13.5 20% 19.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.08 4K Write 1.04 4K Mixed 0.71 71% 1.61 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 39%
Kingston DataTraveler Elite USB 3.0 16GB-$19 144 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 11GB free, PID 168c Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Read 73.7 Write 25 Mixed 33.4 48% 44 MB/s	4K Read 8.69 4K Write 0.11 4K Mixed 0.03 37% 2.94 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 23%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB 9,769 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 7GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	5.73% Terrible	Read 20.7 Write 8.55 Mixed 10.2 15% 13.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.59 4K Write 0.007 4K Mixed 0.01 14% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.73% Great: 16%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 4GB 1,195 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	4.45% Terrible	Read 19 Write 3.48 Mixed 6.07 9% 9.52 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 15% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.45% Great: 7%
JetFlash Transcend 2GB 533 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	7.12% Terrible	Read 28.7 Write 5.92 Mixed 7.99 14% 14.2 MB/s	4K Read 6.96 4K Write 0.008 4K Mixed 0.007 26% 2.32 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.12% Great: 7%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7 16,591 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 1GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	10% Very poor	Read 51.3 Write 4.2 Mixed 7.46 18% 21 MB/s	4K Read 6.93 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.05 28% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8C-PB HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41.2% Average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 14.2 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 13.2 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 82.7 48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16