Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110926
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 21 '18 at 02:05
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2320-$165 38,345 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	68.4% Good	Memory 89.1 1-Core 83.4 2-Core 164 67% 112 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 317 38% 293 Pts	64-Core 320 20% 320 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Nvidia(10DE 098A) 1.5GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	20.8% Poor	Lighting 24.1 Reflection 25.3 Parallax 31 20% 26.8 fps	MRender 34 Gravity 28.6 Splatting 23.4 23% 28.7 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT09B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 18198 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2371 (B1) Unknown 58 58 497 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 52 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 399 (EB) Unknown 99 99 286 (F1) Unknown 99 99 105326037564
Poor: 46% Great: 73%
GB0750C4414 750GB 394 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 123GB free Firmware: HPG3 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 93 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5966 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 14 (07) Seek error rate 86 60 415256512 (09) Power-on hours count 26 26 65349 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2394 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 55 46 757334061 (C2) HDA temperature 45 54 42949673005 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 64 58 202962486 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	34.3% Below average	Read 52.4 Write 67.1 Mixed 32.9 38% 50.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.07 4K Mixed 0.27 70% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1600 CL11 Series 8GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	47.5% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 14.8 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 14 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 68.3 58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H61-M LE/CSM Builds (Compare 264 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $201Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	39x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	34x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	32x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	28x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	21x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	16x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
SU655 120GBAdataBench 68%, 3,439 samples	9x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	9x

RAM
1600 CL10 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 54%, 4,816 samples	9x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 51%, 21,220 samples	7x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $229

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353