Today's hottest deals

HP Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81E5
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160421
Uptime14 Days
Run DateApr 28 '18 at 22:46
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Memory 45.3
1-Core 25.8
2-Core 53.4
27% 41.5 Pts
4-Core 93.6
8-Core 92.9
12% 93.2 Pts
64-Core 90.5
6% 90.5 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
HP(103C 81E5) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.2301.1002
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
1.87% Terrible
Lighting 2.17
Reflection 3.69
Parallax 2.84
2% 2.9 fps
MRender 2.67
Gravity 1.63
Splatting 3.09
2% 2.46 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.87%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX300 120GB-$42
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M2CR010 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 446
Write 352
Mixed 379
87% 392 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 26.3
4K Mixed 16.9
59% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 18.6
DQ Write 53.6
DQ Mixed 24.5
22% 32.2 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 115%
BHT WR202HH032G E70215F5 31GB
2GB free
Firmware: 150100 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 165
Write 63.3
Mixed 95.5
24% 108 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 3.24
26% 8.38 MB/s
DQ Read 11.6
DQ Write 12.6
DQ Mixed 3.22
5% 9.13 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 CT102464BF160B.M16 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 5.2
14% 4.83 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 4.5
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 179
22% 179 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,998 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback