Asus Z97-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97-A  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140707
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateApr 29 '18 at 18:24
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 89.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 237
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 629
65% 521 Pts
64-Core 630
39% 630 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Asus(1043 8468) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.3% Below average
Lighting 35.4
Reflection 28
Parallax 39.1
29% 34.2 fps
MRender 32.6
Gravity 51.6
Splatting 37.5
33% 40.6 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 600ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 460
Write 188
Mixed 237
65% 295 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 9.64
63% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 20
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 40.8
49% 79.7 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 85%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
561GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 119
Write 153
Mixed 143
104% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 5.45
4K Mixed 0.64
198% 2.24 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 108%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB
29GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
7% Terrible
Read 21.6
Write 5.98
Mixed 9.33
13% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.94
4K Write 0.53
4K Mixed 1.36
79% 1.94 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-809.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 8.3
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 8.9
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-A Builds (Compare 5,091 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-A - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback