Asrock N68-S UCC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics1.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68-S UCC  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20100527
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMay 03 '18 at 19:50
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 8400 Triple-Core
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 29.2
2-Core 60.9
20% 45.1 Pts
4-Core 91.4
8-Core 90.5
12% 90.9 Pts
64-Core 89
6% 89 Pts
Poor: 7% Great: 22%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
MSI(1462 8A98) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.11% Terrible
Lighting 1.27
Reflection 2.46
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.41 fps
MRender 2.19
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.57
1% 1.54 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.11%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
905GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 182
Mixed 146
123% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.21
86% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 107%
WD WD3009FYPX-09AAMB0 3TB
356GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
43% Average
Read 92.4
Write 57.7
Mixed 77.7
57% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 0.37
4K Mixed 0.19
55% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.5 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 3.1
9% 3.03 GB/s
Latency 581
7% 581 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-S UCC Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-S UCC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $9
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback