Asus KGP(M)E-D16

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus KGP(M)E-D16  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK KGP(M)E-D16
Memory3.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120329
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateMay 17 '18 at 03:22
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 6128
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
21.6% Poor
Memory 27.7
1-Core 22
2-Core 27
17% 25.6 Pts
4-Core 83.4
8-Core 159
14% 121 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 51%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Pyro SE 60GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 332ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.3% Below average
Read 245
Write 75
Mixed 120
32% 147 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 19.8
4K Mixed 11.8
46% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 69.6
DQ Write 63.4
DQ Mixed 29.1
32% 54.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 66%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 2TB-$105
917GB free
Firmware: 1AN10003 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 83.8
Write 91.5
Mixed 103
70% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.46
109% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 59%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$35
287GB free
Firmware: 01.01S02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 116
Write 115
Mixed 113
86% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.07
4K Write 0.95
4K Mixed 0.53
120% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 76%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$35
216GB free
Firmware: 01.01S02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 99.8
Write 137
Mixed 103
85% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 2.42
4K Mixed 0.53
136% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 76%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$35
153GB free
Firmware: 01.01S02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 92.9
Write 97.9
Mixed 97.5
72% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.98
4K Write 2.35
4K Mixed 0.56
146% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965516-048.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
21.2% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 8
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 2
7% 2.47 GB/s
Latency 268
15% 268 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KGP(M)E-D16 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus KGP(M)E-D16

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 3% - Terrible Total price: $503
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback