Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-880GMA-UD2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics62.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-880GMA-UD2H  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1768 x 992 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100930
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 17 '18 at 21:46
Run Duration306 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 82.1
1-Core 52.1
2-Core 102
51% 78.9 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 272
29% 230 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.8% Good
Lighting 78.4
Reflection 83.1
Parallax 71.2
64% 77.6 fps
MRender 70.8
Gravity 72.9
Splatting 76.9
61% 73.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
292GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 499
Write 354
Mixed 303
85% 385 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 28.3
118% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 60.5
64% 107 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 129%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$28
53GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 66.2
Write 21.4
Mixed 31.7
30% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 0.91
4K Mixed 0.12
45% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 83%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB
3.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 72.5
Write 132
Mixed 70.4
124% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.46
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 0.69
450% 4.84 MB/s
DQ Read 1.56
DQ Write 14.1
DQ Mixed 0.72
509% 5.45 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 78%
WDC WD40 EZRX-22SPEB0 4TB
219GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 88.7
Write 79.1
Mixed 37.7
82% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.93
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.25
72% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 53%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB
87GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 86.7
Write 58.7
Mixed 10.4
56% 51.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 0.69
4K Mixed 0.29
35% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 46%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
78GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 115
Write 111
Mixed 100
138% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 0.99
4K Mixed 0.17
41% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.3% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 12.3
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 9
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-880GMA-UD2H Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-880GMA-UD2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $390
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback