Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180312
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateApr 13 '21 at 10:38
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$80
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 204
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 396
53% 397 Pts
64-Core 391
24% 391 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$449
MSI(1462 3235) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.9% Very good
Lighting 96.4
Reflection 114
Parallax 102
79% 104 fps
MRender 99.1
Gravity 98.5
Splatting 86
76% 94.5 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
223GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 576 598 276 230 321 282 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
39GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 84 83 83 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 63.7
Write 67.3
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 77.6
46% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 72%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$75
405GB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 79 100 100 100 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 95.5
Write 68.1
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 91.4
57% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 96%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 107 108 109 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 99.8
Write 90.9
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 99.2
64% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 111 145 147 151 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 133
Write 139
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 136
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.7
220% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 94%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
399GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 26 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 32.6
Write 24.2
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 24.2
35% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 49%
ST375064 0AS 750GB
13GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 5.1 5.9 4.8 4.8 4.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
9.31% Terrible
Read 33
Write 28.2
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 4.8
29% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.31%
Great: 25%
SAMSUNG HD203WI 2TB
18GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 1 0.5 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
9.11% Terrible
Read 38.4
Write 32.7
Mixed 31.6
SusWrite 0.4
32% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.11%
Great: 46%
ST310005 28AS 1TB
476GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 35 36 37 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 38.3
Write 40
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 33.2
49% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 40%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB
5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.5 0.1 0 0.1 3.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
20% Poor
Read 35.7
Write 36.7
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 0.7
29% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.7
187% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
51.7% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,173 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $154

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $514
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback