PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H81M-HD3 (all builds) |
Memory | 5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20141201 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 20 '18 at 11:05 |
Run Duration | 193 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 18% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
65%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65
|
32.2%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
90%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Elements 1TB
520GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
16.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5584-010.A00LF 99U5474-028.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
51.7%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 160x |
Core i7-4790Intel $110Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 109x |
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 99x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 121x |
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 65x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 63x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $313 |