Today's hottest deals

HP 700-216

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 700-216  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory6.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140611
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateMay 25 '18 at 16:22
Run Duration359 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)-$130
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 74.4
1-Core 75.6
2-Core 139
58% 96.3 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 229
30% 225 Pts
64-Core 227
14% 227 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8670D
HP(103C 2AE0) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.93% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 8.27
Parallax 7.41
6% 7.73 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 6.63
Splatting 8.22
6% 6.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.93%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AQ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 98.8
Write 130
Mixed 116
87% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 2.43
4K Mixed 0.28
104% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$90
1TB free
Firmware: CC98 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
68% Good
Read 119
Write 118
Mixed 114
88% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.13
63% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68%
Great: 75%
WDC WD80 EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
2TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 131
Write 134
Mixed 124
167% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 4.17
4K Mixed 0.38
157% 1.71 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 84%
WDC WD80 EFAX-68LHPN0 8TB
2TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.8% Good
Read 166
Write 126
Mixed 119
168% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.18
4K Write 4.19
4K Mixed 0.37
160% 1.91 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 65%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID null
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 146
Write 133
Mixed 111
163% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 2.29
4K Mixed 0.24
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 53%
TOSHIBA DT01ABA300 3TB
1.5TB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.8% Average
Read 116
Write 110
Mixed 74.3
124% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.17
61% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 57%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
947GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 110
Write 105
Mixed 86
127% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 2.42
4K Mixed 0.22
93% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 55%
Hitachi HDS5C3030BLE630 3TB
944GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.7% Average
Read 116
Write 123
Mixed 116
154% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.14
60% 0.79 MB/s
WDC WD50 EZRZ-32RWYB1 5TB
862GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42% Average
Read 96.1
Write 94.6
Mixed 88.5
119% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 2.38
4K Mixed 0.26
92% 1.06 MB/s
WDC WD50 EZRZ-32RWYB1 5TB
857GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.6% Average
Read 91.4
Write 94.7
Mixed 99.3
124% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 2.47
4K Mixed 0.26
95% 1.06 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B1G73DB0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.9% Poor
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 9.2
27% 9.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8.8
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-216 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 700-216

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback