Today's hottest deals

Asus P8Z68-V LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V LE  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110712
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 28 '19 at 21:06
Run Duration405 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 90
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 178
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 264
34% 259 Pts
64-Core 319
20% 319 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 84F5) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.46% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 6.88
Parallax 7.97
6% 7.22 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 7.09
5% 6.35 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.46%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 153 163 174 187 189 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 416
Mixed 381
SusWrite 196
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 49
162% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 365
275% 368 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 124%
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$270
20GB free
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 113 114 95 116 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 324
Write 141
Mixed 207
SusWrite 111
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 34.6
122% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 167
131% 183 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
736GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 186 198 182 206 205 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 97
Write 67.2
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 193
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 112%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$124
1.5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 119 115 120 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 138
Write 134
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 116
74% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73%
Great: 92%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$124
863GB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 110 115 110 112 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 140
Write 142
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 110
75% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72%
Great: 92%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 1 0.5 1 0.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 152
Write 101
Mixed 68
SusWrite 1
94% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 69%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB
399GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 32 35 32 35 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 169
Write 78
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 32.5
101% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 69%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB
877GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 32 33 36 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 169
Write 104
Mixed 73
SusWrite 33.3
112% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 69%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
561GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 1.1 3.4 1 0.2 3.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 66.5
Write 91
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 2.8
68% 52.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 55%
Initio ST2000DM001-1ER1 2TB
770GB free, PID 1e40
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 27 25 27 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.3% Very poor
Read 33.7
Write 32.2
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 26.1
40% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.1 MB/s
HGST HDN 724040ALE640 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 19 17 18 18 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 159
Write 134
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 18
110% 92 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 62%
HGST HDN 726040ALE614 4TB
402GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 18 17 18 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 168
Write 130
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 17.7
113% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
88% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 70%
HGST HDN 726040ALE614 4TB
548GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 17 18 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 142
Write 140
Mixed 66
SusWrite 17.7
114% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
82% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29%
Great: 84%
HGST HDN 726040ALE614 4TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 18 17 18 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 138
Write 130
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 17.7
109% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
89% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CML16GX3M4A1600C9 CML16GX3M4A1600C9 CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 CML16GX3M4A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.4% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.1
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 15.8
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V LE Builds (Compare 617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $463
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback