Today's hottest deals

MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics84.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive297% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201113
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 25 '20 at 11:39
Run Duration338 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$486
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 68.6
1-Core 150
2-Core 312
92% 177 Pts
4-Core 610
8-Core 1,207
107% 909 Pts
64-Core 2,899
179% 2,899 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$200
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 112
Parallax 102
86% 106 fps
MRender 95.5
Gravity 103
Splatting 100
82% 99.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$185
565GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2421 2544 2491 2341 2172 2168 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
297% Outstanding
Read 2,166
Write 2,626
Mixed 1,997
SusWrite 2,356
517% 2,286 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 50.9
155% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 724
DQ Write 81.4
DQ Mixed 164
180% 323 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 297%
Great: 472%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
558GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 125 133 136 126 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 149
Write 130
Mixed 94
SusWrite 128
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.3
248% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 80%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
140GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 36 39 40 36 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 41.5
Write 39.6
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 37.2
27% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.4
112% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 51%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
171GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 52 52 53 50 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 68.3
Write 66.8
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 51.5
43% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 58%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
246GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 91 90 90 85 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 109
Write 106
Mixed 99
SusWrite 89.1
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 76%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 117 121 122 113 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 122
Write 121
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 116
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 88%
WD My Passport Essential USB 3.0 1TB
312GB free, PID 0730
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 81 78 82 76 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 77.2
Write 78.1
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 79
94% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 31%
Great: 36%
WD My Passport 2TB
1TB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 83 85 76 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 87.9
Write 90.6
Mixed 31
SusWrite 81
96% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 44%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 36 36 38 34 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 36.9
Write 38.1
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 35.8
49% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 61%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
150GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 1.2 0.9 0.4 0.8 0.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
9.09% Terrible
Read 36.9
Write 35.2
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 0.9
30% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.09%
Great: 48%
HGST HDN 724040ALE640 4TB
416GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 37.6
Write 39.3
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 0.2
36% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
106% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 62%
HGST HDN 724040ALE640 4TB
941GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.3 2.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 38.8
Write 39.3
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 0.6
37% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
105% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 62%
WDC WD10 02FAEX-00Y9A0 1TB
601GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 36.8
Write 33.5
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 0.3
32% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 27.6
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 26
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 77%
Great: 147%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) - $358

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,506
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback